Thursday, 10 September 2020

EDUCATION – A LAYMAN’S VIEW

National Education Policy 2020 (NEP2020) has been launched by the Government of India. As is the tradition in the country, an instant debate has ensued. The debate, however, is a bit subdued. The impact of the proposed policy is yet to sink in. In our country, all issues are weighed from a political perspective. One state government, politically opposed to the party in power at the centre, has already raised its voice declaring that the centre could not impose its policy on the states. Other political entities are probably watching the reactions of the public and the educational institutes. They will only take a stand only after feeling the pulse of the public and weighing them against their political agenda. Many political leaders are incapable of taking a stand because of their lack of basic education. There has been a recent instance when two brothers, both school dropouts adorned the offices of deputy chief minister and health minister of a state!

NEP2020 looks good. Of course, my opinion hardly matters. The policy engulfs a few new concepts.

The current system of pre-school or play schools will be under the overall education package. Earlier, this period of infant education was left in the hands of private entrepreneurs.

Students will have the choice of opting out at any stage and be entitled to a certificate confirming the level of their education. This is expected to eradicate the stigma of being branded as a drop out.

Choice of subjects will be flexible.  One can study physics with Sanskrit, mathematics with anthropology and economics with biology. This will cease the categorisation of Arts, Science and Commerce.

The role of the Boards will gradually decline and schools will be empowered to enjoy a degree of autonomy unprecedented in India.

There will be focus on vocational training during the process to ensure job eligibility when one steps out to the professional domain.

Students will also have the option of adopting their mother tongue or any other regional language as the medium of education, up to a certain grade.

So far so good but an irritating question has not been addressed. Will the new policy liberate the students from the curse of the menace called private tuition? It is openly acknowledged that there is a parallel and thriving education system, where the students and guardians get sucked in.

Decades ago, a student, weak in a particular subject sought the help of the teachers outside school hours. The teachers obliged and charged a nominal fee to supplement their meagre salary. A private arrangement between a teacher and student has grown into a profitable business over the years. Teachers are much better paid these days but additional inflow of money is hard to resist. In course of time, the individual enterprise expanded into large empires and adopted a new identity, - Tutorial Homes. Funny enough, guardians resist any hike in school fees and resort to agitation if the school administrations suggest fee increase but they are quiet about similar increase by the Tutorial Homes. These Tutorials earned the reputation of successfully preparing students for entrance examinations to reputed colleges and university and guardians are ready to pay a little extra if needed. The entire scenario exposes a huge credibility gap as far as the schools are concerned. The system implies that the schools are unable to educate their students and guardians are forced to outsource the teachings to unrecognised institutes. Students follow two parallel systems simultaneously with the schools paying minor roles. This additional burden robs the children of their childhood.

Tutorial home are big business. The owners make money. Teachers supplement their income substantially. Students willy-nilly participate in the hope of a lucrative future.

The wrought had gone so deep, it would be a herculean task to uproot the system. Most of these tutorial homes are owned by politicians and their cronies. Therefore, right or wrong, the parallel system will continue to prosper.

Kolkata, 10 September 2020

3 comments:

  1. Very well articulated blog. The menace of private tuition and coaching centers to train for competitive exams need to go. I have one more issue with current education system. The growth needs to be holistic with proper balance between intellectual, physical and social traits. Many a brilliant students are misfit in practical life because of lack of soft skills.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Despite the Disclaimer "You may read this if you have nothing better to do..." its a seer joy going through it again and again, specialy the Intro....Full of Humour.....Description regarding the scene of Debate-on-Govt Policies, resembled a zoology practical class with a drugged frog nailed on a table.... Its good to know that new policy is aiming towards creating usable Professionals and will reduce production of Blok-Bord Professors... in this On-Line and Google era...probably appropriate...

    Looking forward to read more such "my-opinion-hardly-matters; on all other opinions please..C.Dhalsamant

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simple way to wane the influence of the leeching ‘Tutorial Homes’ is to have good teachers in the schools. Good teachers are costly, but not as costly as the bad teachers whose actions are wasting and spoiling the generation.. Remuneration of teachers has increased manifold, so also, that of other professionals, thus diluting the status of teachers. Salary wise, teachers should be in exalted position. The proven experts in different relevant fields should be made part-time/guest teachers. Periodical assessment of the teachers and students should be gauged on standard scales. Teachers should be frequently updated on curriculum and relevant technology. Field visits in very small groups and project works should be conducted seriously; emphasis should be on quality of content rather than on presentation. Working hours of the school should be increased while curtailing the syllabi judiciously. Weeding should be scrupulously done to keep the teachers on their toes. Any suspicion of corruption, nepotism, harassment etc. should be promptly and conspicuously dealt with.

    ReplyDelete